Multi-Site Road Trip

Written by admin on March 12, 2010 – 3:44 am

YouTube Preview ImageI recently read the new book Multi-Site Church Road Trip by Geoff Surratt, Greg Ligon, and Warren Bird.  After reading The Multi-Site Revolution several years back, this was a wonderful update.

6 or 7 years ago, I had the opportunity to meet Dave Ferguson for dinner at a restaurant in Brighton, Michigan where Community Christian Church was then working on a potential site.  Dan Reeves introduced me to CCC and the Ferguson brothers who were then cutting edge (and still are) in the multi-site movement.  Then, as reflected in The Multi-Site Revolution, multi-site was new, exciting, and and catalyst to new growth.  They were multi-siting in old churches and even in a housing development for the elderly.  I had a chance to hear their strategy at a small conference in Kalamazoo not long after that in which they talked about the “franchising” of churches.  Initially, that rubbed me the wrong way, but with the right spirit and for the right reasons, that idea was cheaper, more effective, and provided more accountability for “church planting” as well as more support for the planters (or campus pastors, as their usually called.)  I had a chance later to visit the Yellow Box and worship with CCC and was really impressed with their innovation, passion, and down-to-earth evangelicalism.  CCC was really my only real personal interaction with multi-siting until I began reading more about it in Leadership Network’s articles.

I now serve at a large church just about to celebrate its 50th anniversary.  We worship just under 2000 most Sundays, and for the last 5 years, myself and the other leadership have worked diligently to move our church not only towards planting, but towards being a multiplication center with church multiplication at the heartbeat of our mission.  We’ve been involved in church plants in the past, but had gotten away from that focus and got sucked into the megachurch growth movement – which is only a negative comment because of the loss of a planting focus.   Out of that focus, we’ve decided to plant 4 churches in the next 5 years through venues, sites, and plants.  A month ago, we launched our first venue on our central campus called Rock Harbor with 60% of the attendees (170-200 total worshipers) from outside the church.  We’re now looking to out first site to possibly launch in September or October.  We’re also involved in the planting of a cluster of at least 5-10 churches in central Florida that will also launch this next year.

The Multi-Site Road trip has been an awesome primer in what’s happening around the country and about the maturation of multi-siting over the past 10 or so years.   What I loved about this book was that it didn’t give a silver bullet and didn’t promote a one-size fits all approach.  In fact, exactly the opposite was true.  MSR defines multi-siting as “one church meeting in multiple locations” and identifies five basic models:

  1. video venues
  2. regional campuses
  3. teaching teams
  4. partnerships
  5. low risk models

The authors give examples of all these models and show how these models actually play out in real churches, real teams, with real struggles.  It also helps the reader to see that multi-siting is not just for the large, or mega church, but that it is a strategy for growth that helps churches to reach new communities, make room for new people, or as our planting network (The Harbor Network) would say, lives into the reality that “new churches reach new people.”  It was insightful to read that multi-siting may be an evolution of church strategy not unlike the addition of a second or third service, something that will in the future be “the new norm” as the book calls it.  The book is both practical and encouraging, and is a must read for anyone either considering venues or multi-siting, as an alternative to traditional “planting,” and as a catalytic idea for a church looking to expand into the community.

  • Google Reader
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Evernote
  • Share/Bookmark
Tags: , , , ,
Posted under Books, Church, Leadership | No Comments »

Obstacles Welcome

Written by admin on October 26, 2009 – 6:42 am

I just finished reading the book Obstacles Welcome: turn adversity to advantage in business and life.  This book by Ralph de la Vega is part autobiography, part leadership history, part leadership principles, part self-help, and part personal development.   de la Vega, President and CEO of AT&T Mobility and Consumer Markets has been responsible and overseen everything from the move to mobile to the proliferation of the iPhone.  The book starts out, though, with stories from de la Vega’s youth in which he emigrated to the United States without his parents through a last minute glitch at the airport.  At the age of 10, he began his life in the United States without his parents.

I really enjoyed reading Obstacles Welcome.  It was a really accessible and easy read, and de la Vega takes the complexity of managing a huge corporation and a gives simple but not simplistic look into how he does it.  I also appreciated the type of leadership de la Vegan seems to exhibit.  He appears to be a person who values people, virtue, integrity, hard work, and determination.  After reading this book, I thought to myself, “de la Vega would make a good mentor” and that is exactly what he does through this book, becoming  a personal and leadership mentor.  If you’re in a leadership position, it’s worth a read.

  • Google Reader
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Evernote
  • Share/Bookmark
Tags: , , ,
Posted under Books, Leadership, Review | 1 Comment »

A New Monasticism

Written by admin on September 24, 2009 – 8:45 am

new_monasticismI’ve had about 10 books going for awhile, and I’m trying of focus on finishing one at a time. I just finished reading The New Monasticism: What it has to say to the church, “an insider’s perspective” by Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove. I’ve mentioned the new monasticism before, and I have a lot of respect for what they’re trying to do. The New Monasticism movement reminds me a little bit of the way George Hunger III described St. Patrick’s monastic project in the Celtic Way of Evangelism (a fabulous book, and a must read as far as I’m concerned.)  He talked about how the early missionary monks to the Celts moved into their cities and rural sprawl and created a kind of monastic island in the middle of these people.  These monastic communities had a strict rule of life, served the people in their community, offered hospitality to strangers, and sought to transform a culture from the inside out.

I really appreciate the 12 Marks of the New Monasticism.  Hartgrove gives a good basic understanding of how monastics have been a part of renewal in the church throughout various centuries.  He writes about how monastics seek not to separate from the church or become an alternative, but to bring renewal and reformation to the church by returning to some key roots such as hospitality, sharing all things in common, prayer, and serving others.  This is how Hartgrove begins, by sounding the call, “the church in America isn’t living up to what it’s supposed to be.  Somehow we’ve lost our way.”  The point of monastic movements is to remind the church of its true identity, and that’s true for the New Monastics as well.

I had a fabulous conversation with a gentleman from my church recently who’s feeling the same way.  He loves the church, and yet he feels like the church in America missing the point of the mission at so many levels by putting money and energy into too many things that are not the heart of the reasons for the church in the world on God’s mission.  In his words, “We’ve so boughten into the American dream, that we’ve forgotten what the church is supposed to be.”  Hartgrove writes about this very thing.

What’s unique about this movement is that it takes seriously the renewal of the church and the ancient practices of monasticism in a way that is both inclusive of married couples and families and is also deeply embedded within the cultures of this world, particularly urban settings.  These settings are often referred these days by many of us as “abandoned places of the empire,” referring to those places, particularly urban, that have been deeply affected by the contemporary empire’s of consumerism and progress.  I’ve appreciated everything I’ve read and heard from the many in this movement and am already seeing how they are affecting the church in dramatic ways, Shane Claiborne being one of the key players here.

The New Monastics have also, like many people I respect, been deeply influenced by John Perkins.  Years ago, I sent some students to learn from Perkins and his community, and it was a life-changing experience for many of them.  Particularly, his 3 R’s are foundational (Relocation, Redistribution, and Reconciliation) for only only the New Monastic movement, but for other renewal thinkers in the urban settings as well (ie. Christian Community Development Association).  The other thing I deeply value is people like this who are able to speak intelligently and passionately about justice issues, poverty, and concern for the least of these while also maintaining some of the evangelical commitments of the Scripture.  More and more voices are emerging that are neither conservative nor liberal, fundamentalist nor mainline, republican nor democrat but hold together the biblical truths which cross such narrow, dualistic, and truncated views of the Scripture.

Good read for anyone who is thinking about the emerging church, renewal of the church and culture, poverty, urban ministry, community, and what some consider a more “radical” Christianity, which I think is probably closer to the identity of the early church than many of the churches in America today.

  • Google Reader
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Evernote
  • Share/Bookmark
Tags: , , , , ,
Posted under Books, Church, Culture, Emerging Church, Evangelicalism, Leadership, Poverty, justice, missional | No Comments »

Fearless by Max Lucado

Written by admin on September 8, 2009 – 12:13 am

Buy

Read

It’s been a long time since I’ve read a Max Lucado book.  Lucado’s new book, Fearless, is a book about the fears that are so prevalent in our lives and how they affect us.  Lucado takes these fears on head on and matches fear with courage, and fright with faith, with heavy doses of mercy, grace, and generous love.  It’s an uplifting book that en-courages by giving you a dose of an alternative, biblical reality of a God in control.

What I like about Lucado is his ability to use Scripture, prayer, stories, examples, and easy to read, engaging and creative writing.  In this book, Lucado looks past fear and into the heart of the pain behind and inflicted by so many of our fears.  He is engaging in stories and metaphors, and then is a straight shooter with the clarity of biblical truth.

The promise of Christ and the contention of this book are simple: we can fear less tomorrow than we do today. [p. 13]

Destructive anxiety subtracts God from the future, faces uncertainties with no faith, tallies up the challenges of the day without entering God into the equation. [p. 46]

Lucado takes on fears like  insignificance, disappointing God, worry, parenting, the lurking fears of ultimate desperation, violence, financial fears, death, life’s surprises, doubt, and many more.  From an opening story of his brother, to fables, to Stalin’s Russia, to a ride with a fighter pilot, to the hospital bedside, to his dog molly, quotes from people like Bertrand Russell and Sartre, to his daughter’s wedding, CS Lewis, his own heart condition, to Woody Allen and many more, Lucado is engaging and helps everyday people connect everyday fears with the truths of Scripture and a bigger God.
This is a good book, and a good encouragement in an all-too fear driven culture.
  • Google Reader
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Evernote
  • Share/Bookmark
Tags: , , ,
Posted under Books, Discipleship, Of Interest, Scripture | No Comments »

The Expanded Bible Review

Written by admin on September 2, 2009 – 6:58 am

The Expanded Bible

The Expanded Bible

I recently got a copy of The Expanded Bible, New Testament, published by Thomas Nelson. It’s text is a modified New Century Version, and the “contributing scholars” are Tremper Longman III, Mark L. Strauss, and Daniel Taylor. I’m new to Strauss, but I’ve appreciated Longman’s writings and thoughts as a biblical scholar for a long time. I first learned about him through Dan Allender (who happens to be a promoter on the dust jacket). Taylor, as far as I’ve known, is more of a writer than a biblical scholar, but has always worked with biblical material, is contibuting editor to Books & Culture, etc. I had my introduction to Taylor at the Calvin Faith & Writing Conference years ago.

In any case, this is a very interesting resource, and I’ve already found it quite useful. What these writers/ scholars have done is take the New Century Version and then expanded it within the text to include alternative translations for words or phrases, literal translations of the words, the traditional translation (read KJV), comments, references and textual variants. Rather than have some of these within the footnotes, or expanded explanations (as in a Study Bible), these are included within the text. Doing this allows the reader to see the translation decisions that need to be made, or the possible other meanings, textures of the text, etc. It also allows the reader to see both the formal equivalence possibilities (favoring a more literal translation) and functional equivalence models (favoring words that convey meaning rather than being literal) – choices which most translations make and you never see.

What I appreciate about the Expanded Bible is the ability to really see what’s going on a little better without a) having to go to multiple translations or b) having to go back to the original language. Particularly for those who do not have training in Greek or haven’t studied the textual variants or semantic range of words or idiomatic renderings, this can be a great help for Bible Study or teacher preparation.

One thing that may be lacking here is a more helpful explanation of textual variants as well as translation in general. There is a good, short explanation of the difference between a formal and functional model, but more information in the introduction could help those who pick this up and haven’t been introduced to the issues. What I find in most churches is a relative lack of knowledge about how the bible has been contructed, about additional manuscripts, scribal errors, the decision-making process of most translators (older, harder reading, etc.)

However, overall, I think this is a great addition to or prequel to a Study Bible. It allows you to get into the text with more texture without getting into someone else’s decisions about what the correct reading is, or someone else’s interpretation. With any translation, many decisions have been made. With a study bible, there is lots of commentary on interpretation.

I would not probably use this Bible as a normal “reading” bible. I would find all the symbols and extra information distracting, but in the right uses, it can be really helpful. I think an Old Testament Version would be great.

  • Google Reader
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Evernote
  • Share/Bookmark
Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted under Books, Church, Comments, Review, Scripture | No Comments »

Some recent sermons

Written by admin on August 18, 2009 – 7:35 pm

I haven’t posted any sermons lately, so here are a couple from the last several months:

Revolutionary Love 8-2-09

Love in Action 7-5-09

Angels 6-14-09

  • Google Reader
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Evernote
  • Share/Bookmark
Posted under Uncategorized | No Comments »

Bono: The church… 3 years later #tls09

Written by admin on August 7, 2009 – 4:45 pm

These are some of my notes from the eighth session of the Willow Creek Leadership Summit.

Have you seen any difference 3 years later (since Bill’s last interview at the Summity with Bono) in the way the church is responding to global poverty and AIDS?
“As a person who really enjoys going off on the church, you’ve really ruined it for me.”
“We’ve referred to the church as the sleeping giant, but I didn’t realize the giant could run that fast.”
“The church is now in the lead, not in the rear.”
“In the global village, Africa’s down the lane…”
Bill challenged Bono on why he’s not more committed to the local church, when he’s so passionate about the place of the church.  Bono said he is part of the church, but he probably isn’t more committed because of the denominationalism.
“It’s not charity… it’s something else… it’s justice and equality.”
It’s not ok that a child dies because they can’t get a 20 cent immunization.
  • Google Reader
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Evernote
  • Share/Bookmark
Posted under Uncategorized | No Comments »

Chip and Dan Heath: Switch #tls09

Written by admin on August 7, 2009 – 3:50 pm

These are some of my notes from the seventh session of the Willow Creek Leadership Summit.

There are changes we choose, and changes that choose us.
Part of us wants to change and part of us like to stat the same.
If you have 9 things in your organization, 2 things that are bad, 5 that are working and 2 that are shining stars…what do you do?
  • Focus, study and replicate the 2 that are stellar
  • Look for the bright spots and find out what’s different; throw resources behind those and multiply
When going after big issues, focus on sequences of small solutions and small starts.
“Shrink the change” – Take a large change, and run a micro version; get some small victory.  Then, resource and multiply and go big.
We owe it to people to prepare them for adversity.
Ideo's View of Hope to Confidence

Ideo's View of Hope to Confidence

There are people who have the “growth mindset.”  They are always thinking that with work, they can become better.  But built into that whole process is a tolerance for failure.
“Failure is not an option” is ridiculous.  It is often through failure that success comes.  It may be an early warning sign for success.
Sometimes we think we have a problem with someone who won’t change, or won’t accept our ideas.  In this sense, we think we have a “people” problem when we might actually have a “situation” problem.  This is called a fundamental attribution problem.
  • Google Reader
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Evernote
  • Share/Bookmark
Tags: , ,
Posted under Church, Conference, Culture, Emerging Church, Leadership | 1 Comment »

David Gergen: Eyewitness to Power #tls09

Written by admin on August 7, 2009 – 1:34 pm

These are some of my notes from the sixh session of the Willow Creek Leadership Summit.

  • Each of us has our own journey and path to and in leadership.
  • A teacher of leadership cannot teach a leader.   You can, however, introduce people to models and make them aware of leadership principles.
  • Can you create a culture in an organization in which people are encouraged to behave certain ways towards each other and aspire to serve and to lead one another.
  • Be a “reflective practitioner.”  Where you really learn leadership is by doing it in the arena by leading, but then also by reflecting on the practice.  What did I do wrong?  What did I do right?  What have I learned?
  • “Not every reader is a leader, but every leader is a reader.”  –Harry S. Truman
  • It’s like Jacob wrestling… you have to be willing to wrestle.
  • Don’t confuse motion with progress.
Bill Hybels:  What was the most admirable quality of each of the 4 Presidents you served?
  • Nixon:  The best strategist I’ve ever met… he could see how history was about to unfold and would seek to bend history…”  ”Someone who can look further back can look further ahead.”  –Churchill
  • Ford:  ”The most decent president I’ve ever worked for.”
  • Reagan: “The best leader in the White House since Franklin Roosevelt… he was a principled man… he had a contagious optimism about life.”
  • Clinton:  ”Resilience… he was always willing to get back up.”  ”Very, very bright guy with an extremly quick, tactical mind.”
“Sometimes the right hand does not know what the far right hand is doing.”  –Ronald Reagan
Bill Hybels:  Without saying nasty things, you saw weaknesses in all these men.
  • Nixon:  ”I was really glad I read Machiavelli before I worked for Nixon… There is a very dark side in here, too… he had these demons he couldn’t control and they eventually took him down.  He was the author of his own demise.”
  • Ford: “Sometimes he was a bit naive.”
  • Reagan:  ”Probably his detachment… Reagan would sometimes let others put their hands on the wheel.”
  • Clinton: “Nixon had fundamental character issues that came back to haunt him, and Clinton had cracks in his character, too.”
Bill Hybels: Great leaders carry with them great flaws.  Do you agree that general theory is true?
  • Not all great leaders are flawed.
  • All of us are flawed; the process of growing to maturity is trying to come to grips with the flaws.  ”Coming to grips with the dark-side.”  You have to be aware enough of your flaws that you don’t hurt other people.

“The year of the The greatest leaders today are those who have great teams.” –Warren Bennis

“If you want to go fast, go alone.  If you want to go far, go together.” –

Bill Hybels:  Talk to us aobut the “symbolism” in leadership

  • Leadership is working with others to achieve shared goals.  It involves persuasion, trust, and communication.
  • Clothing of Ghandi (to demonstrate simplicity) and Churchill (to demonstrate optimism) and Mandela (to demonstrate servant leadership).
“Speeches take place within a context never a vaccum.  Listeners bring to the occassion not only their dreams and aspirations, but a range of questions about the speaker.  Who is he down deep?  What does he really stand for?  Does he speak with authority?  Does he care about people like me? Can I place my faith and trust in him?”
–Gergen
Aristotle:  Good speeches have the following three components
  • Ethos – believability of the speaker
  • Logos – do yo uhave a compelling logic
  • Pathos – emotions
If you’re speaking to a group who doesn’t know you, your introduction needs to connect you to them so that they can open themselves up to the reasoned part of your speech (logos).  What people want at the end of the day is a call for action or something that appeals ot the emotions.
  • When Cicero spoke, people said, “Come let us think.”
  • When Demosthenes spoke, people said, “Come, let us march!
Bill Hybels: Talk about the personal habits of leaders.
  • What’s important to me is the self-discipline so that you have more to give as a person.
  • People who allow their bodies to go flabby allow their minds to flabby as well.
  • Building time into your day to reflect.
  • Building time into the day to be with people you cherish and who cherish you.
Bill Hybels:  As an educated parishioner going into church, what are you hoping is going to happen?
  • A place to find inner peace, to step back into something larger that gives you a sense of well-being and that this is not about you.
  • I’d like to learn something.
  • To find a moral compass, a moral “north,” an anchor for the soul and for your leadership.

“Bill Clinton was a man who had a 360 degree view of the world, but often times lacked a moral compass.”

    • Google Reader
    • Delicious
    • LinkedIn
    • MySpace
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Digg
    • Evernote
    • Share/Bookmark
    Tags: , ,
    Posted under Church, Conference, Culture, Leadership | No Comments »

    Wess Stafford: Leveraging Your Past #tls09

    Written by admin on August 7, 2009 – 11:32 am

    These are some of my notes from the third part of the fifth session of the Willow Creek Leadership Summit.

    • I’m a victim of a broken heart from poverty; a broken spirit from abuse.
    • The pain I’ve experienced is the catalyst for leadership  integrity, passion, leadership.
    • They’re not going to care what you know, until they know why you care.
    • Because of my pain I’m useful somehow in the kingdom of God.
    Wess told an incredible story of his abuse as a child in a boarding school in Africa along with many other children.  It was a horrendous story in which he experienced an average of 17 beatings a week, along with 50 other students.  This was a Christian boarding school for missionary kids.  This is not the first time I’ve heard stories like this from MK’s.
    “The very people who should have been protecting us were our attackers.”
    Wess spoke about how a little poor African village was the bosom of his restoration.  He learned compassion from the poor in Africa who loved him, and learned terror at the hands of Christian leaders at his boarding school.
    At a moment facing the torture of one of his torturors, he felt a great courage to not be shamed or give in to the horrid delight of his torturor:  ”I knew that this was his Waterloo, and this was my Masada.”  ”At that moment I received my call to protect children from that time on.”
    Poverty and abuse speak the same language to a children, and word is “Give up.”  I see Satan using the same weapons he tried to use on me on other children around the world.
    What’s your cause?  What do you lead?  Does it move you to tears?  Can it move you to tears?  Tears of sorrow at the need and tears of joy at the victories.  What is it that moves you passionately?
    Forgiveness:
    • If you don’t forgive people, you are letting them live rent-free in your heart.
    • “You took yesterday; you cannot have tomorrow.”
    • “Forgiveness will not necessarily mean you will forgive.  But you will not forget what you will not forgive.”
    • Google Reader
    • Delicious
    • LinkedIn
    • MySpace
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Digg
    • Evernote
    • Share/Bookmark
    Tags: , , ,
    Posted under Church, Conference, Culture, Leadership, justice | No Comments »